Dueling Soho developers beef over unobstructed views Agime Group accuses Madigan Development of using DOB to block project

570 Broome Street and 111 Varick Street

Building a condo tower with 360-degree views is any developer’s dream. But what if the owner of the lot next door has the exact same idea?

That, in a nutshell, is what a new legal duel between Agime Group and Madigan Development is all about. Agime wants to build a 25-story, 287-foot-tall tower at 568-570 Broome Street in Hudson Square. Madigan wants to build a 290-foot tall apa爱上海同城论坛

爱上海同城
rtm上海龙凤论坛

新上海贵族宝贝论坛
ent building next door at 111 Varick Street. Now Agime filed a lawsuit against the neighboring developer accusing it上海夜网

阿爱上海同城
of trying to sabotage the rival project to preserve its own building’s views.

Agime, headed by Murat Agirnasli, is able to build 287 feet tall because the Department of Buildings designated the area in front of 570 Broome a so-called Wide Street, which increases the building’s maximum allowable height. According to a complaint filed in New York State Supreme Court on Tuesday, Madigan wrote to the DOB challenging the Wide Street designation and plans to appeal a ruling that upheld the designation. If Madigan gets its way, Agime will only be able to build 185 feet tall.

Agime alleges that Madigan wrote to the DOB in violation of a zoning lot development agreement prohibiting such interference because it wanted “爱上海同城对对碰

爱上海同城论坛
to provide unobstructed views to the units on the upper floors of its building.”

Agime paid $31 million for the lot in 2014 and dished out another $10.2 million for air rights, according to a previous report and the complaint. Construction is already under way.

Agime’s attorney and Madigan did not respond to emails seeking comment.

The t上海龙凤论坛

新上海贵族宝贝论坛
wo firms aren’t the first developers to bicker over views. Extell Development threatened to block Vornado Realty Trust’s condo project 220 Central Park South because it would have blocked views from Extell’s Central Park Tower project. The two sides settled their dispute in 2013 by each agreeing to move their projects a little to the side.

Tags: Architecture and Design, Development, hudson square
We are having some technical difficulties. Try again later.

By clicking Subscribe you agree to our Privacy Policy.